A comment on Bloomberg View article:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-08/economists-have-a-lot-to-learn-from-the-weather.html
When I first started studying economics back in college, I was stunned: all consumers perfectly rational? Free markets always lead to maximization of utility? It was in a stark contrast to what I have experienced as someone who saw Soviet Union collapse and embrace the free market theology to the extreme. So I asked my professors: how could something this unrealistic explain all the complexity that actually exists? They told me you had to start with some assumptions to see the gist of it, but you can then relax them to arrive to the more realistic ones. To the best of my knowledge, a model that would really explain the real world of economics is still to be developed. But that doesn't seem to bother most of the economists. Neoliberalism (criticized by some bright minds, Joseph Stiglizt one of them) feels more like a religion than a science. Believed to be right until proved otherwise.
■
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-08/economists-have-a-lot-to-learn-from-the-weather.html
When I first started studying economics back in college, I was stunned: all consumers perfectly rational? Free markets always lead to maximization of utility? It was in a stark contrast to what I have experienced as someone who saw Soviet Union collapse and embrace the free market theology to the extreme. So I asked my professors: how could something this unrealistic explain all the complexity that actually exists? They told me you had to start with some assumptions to see the gist of it, but you can then relax them to arrive to the more realistic ones. To the best of my knowledge, a model that would really explain the real world of economics is still to be developed. But that doesn't seem to bother most of the economists. Neoliberalism (criticized by some bright minds, Joseph Stiglizt one of them) feels more like a religion than a science. Believed to be right until proved otherwise.
■
Comments